Win, Lose, or Draw: How to Do an Honest Self-Assessment of Your Insurance Agency

Here's a question that most insurance agency owners haven't answered honestly: are you winning, losing, or drawing right now? Not in some vague, motivational sense, specifically, concretely, with actual numbers. Are you winning on retention? Losing on new business? Drawing on team development? Winning on culture, losing on profitability?

The honest self-assessment, the one that doesn't give you a pass on the categories where you're underperforming, is one of the most valuable exercises an agency owner can do. Most don't do it, because losing at anything feels bad and it's more comfortable to stay in the vicinity of wins. But selective scorekeeping is a recipe for strategic blindness, and strategic blindness is how agencies plateau.

What Winning Actually Looks Like

Winning in an insurance agency has objective markers that most owners know but don't always measure explicitly. Retention above 90% is winning. New business production at or above plan is winning. Net promoter score that reflects genuine client advocacy is winning. Team retention, holding onto good people, is winning. Profitability per account above your targets is winning.

The reason to define winning explicitly is not to celebrate, it's to know what you're actually optimizing for. An agency owner who says "I want to win at retention" without knowing what their current retention rate is, what would constitute winning, and how their actions connect to that metric is not actually optimizing for retention. They're hoping for it.

Write the wins down. Not as a self-congratulatory exercise, but as an inventory of what's working and why, so you can replicate it intentionally.

What Losing Looks Like and Why Owners Resist Naming It

Losses are where the growth is, but they're the hardest to acknowledge. Losing at retention means policies are walking out the door faster than they should be, and that's uncomfortable to quantify because the number makes the cost of the problem real. Losing at hiring means you've made bad decisions about people that have cost the agency time, money, and culture. Losing at marketing means you've spent money that didn't produce adequate return.

The resistance to naming losses is understandable. It feels like failure, and failure feels bad. But unnamed losses don't get fixed. They just continue generating the same negative outcomes, invisibly, until the cumulative damage is severe enough to force attention.

The agency owner who can sit with the discomfort of naming a loss, "I am losing on retention right now, our 12-month retention rate is 83%, and that's not good enough", is the one who can actually build a plan to fix it. The one who avoids the number stays in the comfortable fiction that things are going okay.

The Underrated Category: Draws

Draws are the category most agency owners never think about explicitly, and they may be the most expensive category of all. A draw is a situation where you're investing significant resources, time, money, attention, and getting back roughly what you put in. Breaking even. No meaningful progress.

The draw that deserves the most scrutiny is the one involving people. The team member who has been in the same performance position for two years, not failing badly enough to trigger a termination decision, but not growing and not contributing at the level the role requires. The carrier relationship that produces okay volume but requires disproportionate effort to maintain. The marketing channel that generates leads but has never been assessed for whether those leads produce the right kind of clients.

Draws feel safer than losses because they're not costing you, but they are. They're consuming capacity that could be directed at winning. The opportunity cost of a draw that's consuming 20% of your team's time is everything that 20% of time could have produced if directed at actual growth activities.

The Self-Assessment Protocol

Running an honest win-lose-draw assessment takes about 90 minutes and pays for itself many times over. The structure:

Identify the key categories. For most agencies: retention, new business production, team performance, profitability, client satisfaction, and the owner's use of their own time. Add categories specific to your agency's situation.

Score each category honestly. Not aspirationally, actually. Use numbers where they exist. Use qualitative assessment where they don't, but be specific: "Our team is performing at roughly 70% of what they're capable of" is more useful than "team performance is fine."

Identify the root cause in each loss and draw category. Losses and draws don't fix themselves. They have causes. Identifying the cause is the prerequisite for building the fix.

Build one action for each loss category. Not ten, one. The single most impactful thing you can do in the next 30 days to move the needle on your biggest loss. Specificity and focus beat comprehensive plans that never get executed.

What This Means for Your Agency

Run the assessment this week. Use actual numbers wherever you have them. Be honest about the draws. Sit with the losses long enough to identify their causes. The discomfort of honest assessment is temporary. The benefit of the clarity it produces is compounding.

The Bottom Line

Win, lose, or draw, you're doing all three, right now, in different parts of your agency. The ones who improve most rapidly are the ones who know where they stand in each category and use that knowledge to prioritize ruthlessly. Stop scorekeeping selectively. The full picture is where the leverage is.

---

Catch this episode:

• Listen on Apple Podcasts
• Listen on Spotify
• Watch on YouTube

Level up your agency:

• The Million Dollar Agency Book
• Join Agent Elite on Skool
• Book a Free Strategy Call
• TheIDudes.com