Square Peg, Round Hole: Why Your Best Employee Might Be in the Wrong Seat

You've got a team member who interviews like a rock star, has a great attitude, and genuinely wants to succeed. But their numbers are flat. Their energy is off. They're working hard without producing results, and both of you are frustrated. Before you blame their work ethic or start the termination paperwork, ask a different question: Are they in the right role?

The Misplacement Epidemic

Insurance agencies have a chronic misplacement problem that nobody talks about. An agency owner hires a personable, energetic individual and puts them on the phones to sell. The new hire struggles. The owner assumes it's a training issue and doubles down on coaching. The new hire still struggles. The owner concludes they made a bad hire.

But what if the hire was fine and the placement was wrong? What if that personable, energetic individual is a natural relationship builder who would thrive in a client retention role but wilts under the pressure of cold-calling strangers? What if their superpower is deepening existing relationships, not initiating new ones? You didn't hire the wrong person. You put the right person in the wrong chair.

This happens constantly because most agency owners think in job titles rather than behavioral profiles. They have a "producer" slot to fill, so they hire someone to produce. But "producer" is a title that encompasses wildly different skill sets. An outbound new-business hunter is a completely different animal from an inbound lead closer, who is completely different from a cross-sell specialist, who is completely different from a commercial lines consultative seller. Lumping all of those functions under "producer" and expecting every hire to perform equally across all of them is the definition of forcing a square peg into a round hole.

The Behavioral Profile Approach

The fix starts with understanding that people have natural behavioral tendencies that make them exceptional at certain types of work and mediocre (or miserable) at others. This isn't a judgment, it's science. Decades of behavioral research confirm that placing people in roles aligned with their natural strengths produces dramatically better outcomes than placing them in roles that require them to constantly fight their own wiring.

In an insurance agency, the critical distinction is between hunters, farmers, and operators.

Hunters thrive on the chase. They're energized by new conversations, unfazed by rejection, and motivated by the thrill of closing. They get bored servicing existing accounts and restless when there's nothing new to pursue. Put them in a retention role and they'll underperform and eventually leave.

Farmers thrive on depth. They're energized by building long-term relationships, cross-selling existing clients, and becoming the trusted advisor that clients call for everything. They're uncomfortable with cold outreach and drained by high-volume prospecting. Put them in an outbound hunter role and they'll be miserable and ineffective.

Operators thrive on process. They're energized by efficiency, organization, and making sure nothing falls through the cracks. They love building systems, managing workflows, and keeping the agency running smoothly. Put them in a sales role of any kind and you'll lose a great operations person while gaining a terrible salesperson.

The agency owner's job isn't to hire great people and hope for the best. It's to identify what each person does best and build the role around the person, not the other way around.

The Signs of Misplacement

Misplacement shows up in patterns that are easy to misread if you're not looking for them.

Inconsistent effort. A misplaced employee isn't lazy. They have bursts of high activity followed by periods of disengagement. The bursts happen when some aspect of their role temporarily aligns with their strengths. The disengagement happens when the role demands something that goes against their grain. From the outside, it looks like a motivation problem. From the inside, it feels like swimming upstream.

High competence, low results. The employee understands the work. They can explain the products, recite the process, and demonstrate the skills in training. But when it's time to execute in the real environment, the results don't match the competence. That gap between knowing and doing is often a placement signal, not a performance signal.

Voluntary narrowing. Watch what tasks a misplaced employee gravitates toward on their own. The hunter who's been put in a retention role will find excuses to make outbound calls. The farmer who's been put in a hunter role will spend disproportionate time deepening relationships with their few existing clients. People naturally migrate toward their strengths. If you're paying attention, your employees are telling you where they belong through their behavior.

Emotional drain. A well-placed employee comes home tired but satisfied. A misplaced employee comes home tired and depleted. The difference is whether the work is draining because it's demanding (which is healthy) or draining because it's fundamentally misaligned with who they are (which is corrosive). Over time, misplacement leads to burnout, disengagement, and turnover, and you lose someone who could have been a star if you'd put them in the right seat.

What This Means for Your Agency

Take this week to evaluate every person on your team through the hunter-farmer-operator lens. For each person, ask three questions:

1. What tasks do they gravitate toward when they have discretion over their time?
2. Where do they consistently outperform expectations, and where do they consistently underperform?
3. When do they seem energized, and when do they seem drained?

The answers will reveal misplacements that have been costing you money and costing your employees their job satisfaction. In some cases, the fix is a role change. In others, it's a role redesign, adjusting the mix of responsibilities to better align with the person's strengths while still meeting the agency's needs.

This isn't about lowering standards or letting people avoid hard work. It's about deploying your human capital as strategically as you deploy your financial capital. No intelligent investor puts all their money in one asset class. No intelligent agency owner should put all their people in the same type of role and expect equal results.

Use behavioral assessments during your hiring process to identify tendencies before you make placement decisions. And for your existing team, have honest conversations about where they feel most effective and where they feel most strained. The data is already there, you just need to look at it.

The Bottom Line

The square peg in the round hole isn't a hiring failure, it's a placement failure. And it's one of the most expensive, most common, and most fixable problems in agency management. Before you terminate the next underperformer, ask whether you put them in a position to succeed. The answer might save a great employee and transform your agency's performance at the same time.

---

Catch the full conversation:

• Listen on Spotify
• Listen on Apple Podcasts
• Watch on YouTube

Level up your agency:

• The Million Dollar Agency Book
• Join Agent Elite on Skool
• Book a Free Strategy Call
• TheIDudes.com